http://www.bjj.boneandjoint.org.uk/content/96-B/1/36.abstract

The influence of femoral offset on health-related quality of life after total hip replacement

1. T. R.  Liebs, MD, Consultant Orthopaedic Surgeon1 ; 
2. L. Nasser, MD, Foundation Doctor1; 
3. W. Herzberg, MD, Chief Orthopaedic Surgeon2;
4. W. Rüther, MD, PhD, Professor, Chairman3; and 
5. J. Hassenpflug, MD, PhD, Professor, Chairman1

+Author Affiliations

1. 1University of Schleswig-Holstein Medical Centre, Kiel Campus, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Michaelisstr. 1, 24105 Kiel, Germany.
2. 2Asklepios Westklinikum Hamburg, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Suurheid 20, 22559 Hamburg, Germany.
3. 3Rheumaklinik Bad Bramstedt, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Oskar-Alexander-Str. 26, 24576 Bad Bramstedt, Germany.

1. Correspondence should be sent to Dr T. R. Liebs; e-mail: liebs@liebs.eu

Abstract

Several factors have been implicated in unsatisfactory results after total hip replacement (THR). We examined whether femoral offset, as measured on digitised post-operative radiographs, was associated with pain after THR. The routine post-operative radiographs of 362 patients (230 women and 132 men, mean age 70.0 years (35.2 to 90.5)) who received primary unilateral THRs of varying designs were measured after calibration. The femoral offset was calculated using the known dimensions of the implants to control for femoral rotation. Femoral offset was categorised into three groups: normal offset (within 5 mm of the height-adjusted femoral offset), low offset and high offset. We determined the associations to the absolute final score and the improvement in the mean Western Ontario and McMaster Universities osteoarthritis index (WOMAC) pain subscale scores at three, six, 12 and 24 months, adjusting for confounding variables.

The amount of femoral offset was associated with the mean WOMAC pain subscale score at all points of follow-up, with the low-offset group reporting less WOMAC pain than the normal or high-offset groups (six months: 7.01 (SD11.69) vs 12.26 (SD 15.10) vs 13.10 (SD 16.20), p = 0.006; 12 months: 6.55 (SD 11.09) vs 9.73 (SD 13.76) vs 13.46 (SD 18.39), p = 0.010; 24 months: 5.84 (SD 10.23) vs 9.60 (SD 14.43) vs 13.12 (SD 17.43), p = 0.004). When adjusting for confounding variables, including age and gender, the greatest improvement was seen in the low-offset group, with the normal-offset group demonstrating more improvement than the high-offset group.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014;96-B:36–42.

Footnotes

• No benefits in any form have been received or will be received from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article.
  This article was primary edited by G. Scott and first-proof edited by D. Rowley.
• Supplementary material. A table detailing the combinations of implants in the study is available alongside the electronic version of this article on our website www.bjj.boneandjoint.org.uk

• Received December 28, 2012.
• Accepted September 5, 2013.

• ©2014 The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery